WEKO3
-
RootNode
アイテム
Contours of Patronage: Public Administration in Latin America
https://doi.org/10.18952/0002000127
https://doi.org/10.18952/0002000127c115c17b-ac54-45d0-83ca-eb933eff49cf
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
360103.pdf (119 KB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2024-03-21 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Contours of Patronage: Public Administration in Latin America | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題 | Argentina | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題 | Brazil | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題 | Latin America | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題 | merit-based system | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題 | parallel bureaucracy | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題 | patronage | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18952/0002000127 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 著者 |
武石, 典史
× 武石, 典史
|
|||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | This study aims to examine a historical trend of conflicts between patronage- and merit-based systems within the public administration in the contexts of the United States, Brazil, and Argentina from a comparative perspective. In the nineteenth century, the United States introduced an official civil service recruitment system based on formal examinations, which yielded a certain degree of reduction in patronage. In contrast, Brazil and Argentina frequently endeavored to implement merit-based civil service systems but faced resistance from proponents of patronage, which prevented the establishment of the merit-based systems. Both countries followed a different trajectory from that of the United States due to their unique circumstances compared with their western counterpart. In the realm of political dynamics in Latin America, the patronage-based system was, indeed, a contributing factor to corruption and the recruitment of incompetent individuals but simultaneously functioned as a political resource. Scholars expect that the significance and influence of merit-based systems will continue to increase. Nevertheless, both systems will likely work in tandem to enhance the professionalism of public servants and gradually advance the public administration system while maintaining a delicate balance. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 電気通信大学紀要 巻 36, 号 1, p. 21-29, ページ数 9, 発行日 2024-02-01 |
|||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 電気通信大学 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | EISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 09150935 | |||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
