ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 博士論文
  2. 2008

知的活動における手書き入力の有効性に関する定量的研究

https://uec.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1150
https://uec.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1150
9225b7bc-2177-4681-9b59-74db406923ca
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
9000000353.pdf 9000000353.pdf (4.4 MB)
Item type 学位論文 / Thesis or Dissertation(1)
公開日 2009-03-24
タイトル
タイトル 知的活動における手書き入力の有効性に関する定量的研究
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル Quantitative Study on the Effectiveness of Pen Input During Intellectual Work
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec
資源タイプ thesis
著者 MUHAMMED, DZULKHIFLEE BIN HAMZAH

× MUHAMMED, DZULKHIFLEE BIN HAMZAH

en MUHAMMED, DZULKHIFLEE BIN HAMZAH

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 We believe pen-based computing has beneficial effects on work efficiency andcreative thinking. The aim of this research is to understand the way a pen-basedinterface can affect comprehension, memory, and concentration, during intellectualwork. By performing three experiments, we evaluated it quantitatively.In our first experiment, we performed a quantitative analysis of the effectiveness ofmaking annotations by pen during an electronic note-taking task in Japanese, focusingon both the ergonomic and cognitive aspects. We found that the input speed duringnote-taking was faster for pen input than for keyboard input. The results also showedthat the quality of handwritten notes was higher than that of notes input by keyboard;this might have been due to the higher cognitive load during typing. We also found thathandwritten notes remained in our memory longer and that the learning effect duringpen input is higher due to its features: natural and easy input. Observations duringthe experiment revealed several problems faced by subjects in the keyboard input task.Since an evaluation of the significance of these observations required quantitativeevidence, in our second experiment, we repeated the experiment with video analysis ofthe keyboard subtask. By analyzing the participants’ eye movements and theirbehavior throughout the keyboard subtask we obtained quantitative evidence tosupport our findings.Finally, in our third experiment, we performed a quantitative analysis thatinvestigated how a pen-based interface can promote concentration during intellectualwork. By interrupting participant's concentration during a simple calculation taskwith animation superimposed around it, we analyzed participant’s answer speed,incorrect answers and their gaze movements during the task, and found that theycould perform better when answering with pen.The third experiment also demonstrated how animation could give a negative effectto his/her task, and the results showed that misses occured more frequently andparticipants inputted less correct answer when animations displayed around the taskarea compared to task that was done without any of it.
学位名
学位名 博士(工学)
学位授与機関
学位授与機関名 電気通信大学
学位授与年度
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 2008
学位授与年月日
学位授与年月日 2009-03-24
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 11:33:03.394264
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3